• Home
  • About
  • Contact

Lynne Simpson

Non Omnis Moriar

Feed on
Posts
Comments
« Department of Who Knew: The wacky weed as military camouflage
Another Avon FanLit contestant quits in protest »

A brief note on why I quit Avon FanLit

Oct 13th, 2006 by Lynne

From reading my previous FanLit posts and their comment trails, you can figure out that something about it has had me seriously perturbed for the last two weeks. On September 28th, I received specific, conclusive evidence that two individuals cheated in Round Two. One of them cheated in Round One, as well. I've worked in Information Technology for a couple of decades and busted my share of hackers along the way, and the evidence I provided to the contest administrators would have been more than sufficient to confirm allegations of hacking or fraudulent account activity at any company where I have worked.

But FanLit didn't disqualify the cheaters, despite their rules stating that those who have multiple accounts will be removed from the event. I'm pretty sure I know why they made that decision, but I believe it was a mistake. I hoped their warnings to the individuals in question would be sufficient to rein in some of the behavior, but that hasn't been the case. 

One of the pieces of evidence I provided to FanLit was proof of an email discussion, of which I was a part, where these people talked about their multiple accounts and how they thought it was fine to stack the deck. Earlier this week, I confronted the two individuals and told them I thought their only honorable course of action was to remove themselves from the contest, quietly and immediately. They refused. They don't see anything wrong with what they did, although they do have quite a problem with suffering any consequences.

I could no longer be a part of an event where so many good, honest people were writing their hearts out but getting robbed of a fair contest. As I said in the comment trail in another post, I wrote the administrators earlier this evening to ask that my account be deleted. They sent back a very nice email in an attempt to address my concerns. I thanked them and repeated that I wanted my account removed immediately.

I met some really neat people through FanLit and had a lot of fun. I don't regret getting involved with it. But I couldn't sit by and watch people be treated that way anymore.

Posted in Writing

23 Responses to “A brief note on why I quit Avon FanLit”

  1. on 13 Oct 2006 at 1:08 am1Sara Dennis

    Thank you.

  2. on 13 Oct 2006 at 11:03 am2Karen

    It’s unfortunate Lynne that it had to come to this, but it’s just not fair. I wonder if this is another character flaw of the cheaters. Do they really
    think that taking the easy way out will make them better writers than the others since they “ranked” higher? Um, no. Welcome to real world ladies, learn to write like the
    rest of us, and you won’t have to cheat, and guess what–people will actually vote for you.

    -Karen

  3. on 13 Oct 2006 at 11:26 am3Alice Audrey

    I only want to know one thing. Who are they?

    Alice

  4. on 13 Oct 2006 at 11:32 am4Lynne

    Hi, Sara! Thanks for stopping by. :-)

  5. on 13 Oct 2006 at 11:36 am5Lynne

    Hi, Karen! The psychology behind this cheating is fascinating. Depressing, too. I’m comfortable with my decision to leave.

  6. on 13 Oct 2006 at 12:25 pm6Lynne

    An excellent question, Alice, and one that I have no plans — at the moment, anyway — to answer publicly. As it stands now, they’re going to out themselves more thoroughly and expeditiously than if I had done it myself. They’ve been very indiscreet.

  7. on 13 Oct 2006 at 2:42 pm7Cat

    Hmm, that’s news. Are these people also the 0 bandits? I have no idea who you’re talking about; I must not be paying enough attention. It’s sort of difficult thinking anyone on the forum did that. The least FanLit could have done was close their multiple accounts, I hope…

  8. on 13 Oct 2006 at 2:52 pm8Lynne

    Hi, Cat. I have no way of knowing how they vote with their shill accounts, but it’s reasonable to guess that they use them to zero-bomb people. It only makes sense, at least to me.

    I agree that it’s difficult to imagine that folks who are friendly on the forums would do this. It really bothered me to see them making nice with all the people they’d cheated, and that’s one of the reasons I decided to leave.

  9. on 13 Oct 2006 at 8:34 pm9Sara_Lindsey

    Lynne,
    I just wanted to say that I’m very sorry to see you go. Your VR parody still stands out in my mind as one of the most clever pieces I’ve had the good fortune to read! It’s disgusting that people feel the need to cheat their way through the contest, but they’ll never win if their writing is bad enough that they have to cheat. I respect your decision (and that you are intelligent enough to figure this whole thing out) but your parodies and your presence in the forum will be sorely missed!
    Best,
    Sara

  10. on 13 Oct 2006 at 8:46 pm10Lynne

    Hi, Sara! :-) Thanks for stopping by. I’m glad you enjoyed my parody.

    How did your entries do this week? Didn’t you also have a parody? If I recall, it was a wickedly funny one about Damien’s “problem” and Patience’s plan to become a widow.

    I’m hoping that for everyone’s sake FanLit will sew up these operational and technical security holes, because it IS a fun contest. It’s only a few jerks who ruin it for all the nice people.

  11. on 13 Oct 2006 at 9:20 pm11Lynne

    Here are a couple more tidbits of information on the chronology. When I first contacted the FanLit admins about the cheating, I only gave them account names and IP addresses. I didn’t let on that I had email confessions. When they responded a few hours later, they said they’d concluded no cheating had occurred. Despite their pronouncements of sophisticated mechanisms for tracking down fraudulent activity, they weren’t even able to spot the cheating when I put it right in front of them and told them where to look.

    It was only when I sent them further documentation, including the email confessions, that they were able to conclude that wrongdoing had occurred. Whee.

  12. on 13 Oct 2006 at 10:18 pm12moonhart

    Oy, Lynne!

    I had such high hopes for Fanlit. Really. And I did it for fun. Even when the category went against my personal fort?, I thought, “Huh, here’s a chance to try something new and meet some other writers and =maybe= have a shot at winning something. But this whole *waves hands* thing just angers me and not because I ever expected to win it. I really feel sorry for the talented writers who deserve an honest shot to win. What annoys me even more is the whole, “Whee! Let’s all have fun!” mantra that Avon reiterated over and over while you were connecting the dots and presenting them with the evidence.

    Wow.

    Another great opportunity to uphold “fair play” missed.

    Pass the Kool-Aid.

    moon

  13. on 13 Oct 2006 at 10:56 pm13CM

    Sara,

    As for “they’ll never win if their writing is bad enough to cheat”–at some point in my career, I was a teacher. And when I was a teacher, I caught the best student in my class cheating. The BEST student. He didn’t need to cheat; he was smart enough on his own. But he just wanted to “make sure.”

    Unfortunately, intelligence and ethics don’t go hand in hand….

  14. on 13 Oct 2006 at 11:09 pm14Lynne

    Wow, CM. A sad story. I wish people could see what harm they do to themselves in behaving unethically.

  15. on 13 Oct 2006 at 11:10 pm15Lynne

    Hiya, Moon. :-) What I hope for most is that FanLit and Avon will address these security concerns so that honest participants have a fun place to play. I loved FanLit, and I know a lot of other people did, too. There’s still hope that they’ll fix it.

  16. on 13 Oct 2006 at 11:25 pm16Edie Ramer

    Lynne, I haven’t been following the FanLit as it’s not a subgenre I write (although I read Regencies). It sucks that they have evidence that people are cheating but they aren’t asking them to leave.

  17. on 13 Oct 2006 at 11:34 pm17Lynne

    Hiya, Edie. :-) It’s a sad thing, truly. I hope they can learn from this for future contests, because it’s a neat concept. I even got my husband interested enough in FanLit that he wrote an entry for Round Four.

    I love Regencies, too, and this was the first time I’d let anyone else read my attempts at a Regency voice. I’m a science fiction and fantasy gal, for the most part. Maybe when they get all these issues straightened out they’ll have a contest in the genres we write.

  18. on 14 Oct 2006 at 12:02 am18Theresa

    Lynne,

    it sounds to me like the administrators at fanlit didn’t want to know
    about the problem, because they didn’t want to acknowledge it. If they
    had to publically admit that their was cheating involved, it would
    sour the rep of the whole competition. Much easier to just ignore it.
    Unfortunate.

    (grin) I’m thinking we should start blitzing the administrators with
    protests about the cheating…..maybe with enough negative publicity
    they’d actually acknowledge and FIX the problem.

    It was such a good idea. It’s a shame it came to this.

  19. on 14 Oct 2006 at 1:45 am19Christina

    Lynne,
    I am adding my regrets that you are leaving. I am going to miss your parodies as well as your critiques on my chapters. I am
    curious as all get out about the evidence you have, and who it is, but I know that I am so computer illiterate that I probably
    wouldn’t understand it anyway. I just wonder if I should continue trying to write this story with its ever increasing requirements
    and limitations if I have no chance at getting a fair shot. Anyway…I am going to miss you and Sara on the forums, and miss reading
    your stories. Good luck with everything!

  20. on 14 Oct 2006 at 6:01 am20Lynne

    Hi, Theresa! I agree. I think they wanted to keep a lid on things instead of acknowledging the problem. But there’s just no burying a problem like this. It’s obvious to anyone participating that weird stuff’s going on. Their approach to security thus far has mostly been the mysterious “woo woo” approach, when in fact they’d have been better off with more transparency in the process and flat out heavier duty security.

  21. on 14 Oct 2006 at 6:09 am21Lynne

    Hi, Christina! :-) Thanks for stopping by. I will miss reading your entries, and I’m glad you liked my parodies. If you wanna send me anything by email, I’d love to read it.

    One of the things I liked most about the contest was that I never knew what to expect when I clicked “View Chapter.” Not only did I really enjoy all the crazy, brilliant parodies, but I also was genuinely impressed with so many authors’ attempts to make an often frustrating premise into a story and characters I could actually like. I can’t tell you how many times I found myself thinking, “Yeah, I would SO buy this book!”

  22. on 14 Oct 2006 at 6:59 pm22Alice Audrey

    I would dearly love to use a particular name in the parody I’m now working on.

    Alice

  23. on 15 Oct 2006 at 12:55 am23Lynne

    For me, it’s a bigger issue now than the two people who cheated. By not enforcing their own rules, FanLit is damaging the integrity of the contest, and they’re failing to protect honest participants from the misconduct of others. I expected higher standards of behavior from them.

r-word.org
  • Recent Posts

    • One of the best things about a staycation…
    • Apropos of Nothing: Note To Self
    • WordPress as a knowledge base for writers
    • For Your Listening Pleasure
    • Fabulous new article on the financial crisis
  • Recent Comments

    • Lynne on One of the best things about a staycation…
    • Anne Nichols on One of the best things about a staycation…
    • Lynne on Apropos of Nothing: Note To Self
    • Liz Kreger on Apropos of Nothing: Note To Self
    • Lynne on Apropos of Nothing: Note To Self
  • Now Reading

    Planned books:

    • Home: A Novel by Marilynne Robinson
    • Survival of the Fairest by Jody Wallace

    Current books:

    • Bewitching Season

      Bewitching Season by Marissa Doyle

    Recent books:

    • Dark Moon Defender (The Twelve Houses, Book 3) by Sharon Shinn
    • Throne of Jade (Temeraire, Book 2) by Naomi Novik
    • His Majesty’s Dragon (Temeraire, Book 1) by Naomi Novik
    • Angels and Demons by Dan Brown
    • The Stone Age Present by William Allman

    View full Library

  • Categories

    • Animals
    • Apropos of Nothing
    • Books
    • Gaming
    • Gardening
    • Grammar Grump
    • House
    • Jewelry
    • Miscellaneous
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Mythology
    • News
    • Politics
    • Publishing Industry
    • Science
    • Tech
    • Writing
  • Archives

    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006

Lynne Simpson © 2009 All Rights Reserved.

WordPress Themes made for Web Hosting Bluebook


Green Web Hosting! This site hosted by DreamHost.